Dear Mr Patel,

Respectfully, Your points below are noted and acknowledged by myself at least.

Regardless of others, I will attempt to revert further as soon as I can accordingly and as I am able, however I note for all that Mr Earl’s recent actions which, (and noting these are confidential and without prejudice discussions it is assumed you are aware of), has impacted these discussions and indeed many matters related to the business, to such a significant and material degree - both in terms of as are needing to be priority addressed and moreover in terms of the fraudulent and criminal implications as he is thus deemed to have further actioned and as are feared likely to impact negatively on these discussions, which at least in my own opinion have demonstrated some integrity and potential opportunity for progress, but further such as are believed and anticipated as to may now have implicated and indicated actions as may have materially and unlawfully potentially not only destroyed the endeavours herein as have been and attempted by yourself and others hereto but as believed / anticipated likely resulted in the destruction of any opportunity to save the relevant enties and moreover as are additionally perceived and feared pose a very real and high risk to have implicated many others in involvement in criminal activities as to which he has been one of the lead protagonists.

At this point it is unclear if his actions and threats can be mitigated in order to save these discussions and the businesses as referred to herein and / or indeed to protect and/or prevent his actions as he has already inferred and / or as he has threatened in order to save the relevant enties and businesses’ hereto and/or prevent the escalation of matters such as will entirely remove and extinguish any ability by myself, Mr Voce, Mrs Busfield and legal advisors thereto from preventing all matters holistically and without exception as related to these matters and entities now and since likely 2015 being referred and addressed by criminal legislation absolutely – and as has always been the case and considered accordingly will but only harm a multitude of individuals and no doubt it is perceived result in the absolute, catastrophic and complete failure of aforesaid entities and businesses concurrently.

At this time, I am unable to share more insight aside to the outline, initial informal comments I share above – simply because I do not know.

Nonetheless, I will at least do you the courtesy of trying my best herein to briefly respond to the points you make below (given the time demands of Mr Earl’s actions, and notwithstanding my health limitations as I have already relayed and as are factual regardless of any mockery by Mr Earl or others), as follows:

The Company (by my advice previously and as evidenced) has retained a “backup” banking facility at Lloyds Bank such as is available to be used in the event Metrobank do cease service provision – albeit I understand Mr Voce was due to speak to them to try and prevent such finality in any case.
I believe the Companies Accounts are completed – albeit my health has prevented me from addressing / having chance to review recent correspondence on this matter but all I can do is say I will attempt my very best to do so in the next 48 hours.
See Above – but additionally note I believe access and use of the Lloyds accounts are once again unlawfully under Mr Earl’s control and moreover he has changed the passwords as were available to allow Directors to access as previously – this again highlights the harm and barriers Mr Earl’s behaviour’s have and continue to cause the companies’ and businesses’ of relevance here and as have been historically raised and captured accordingly and indeed the audit as has been prudently undertaken, as is it appears to be funded by GCV once again,  for goodwill, has and will require full transparency of these accounts – particularly given there appears to be a number of self-approved and unauthorised transactions completed by Mr Earl as have been identified by such audit aside in any event.
See Above

Additionally, I note for transparency and as relates to matters above and below and as already shared and previously evidenced with appropriate parties and/or Accountants and/or Legal advisors:

Given the above, and Mr Earl’s actions of late and previously, such contain extensive criminal and civil and fiduciary breaches, and as implicate and/or are and have been evidenced accordingly, it is imperative that Mr Earl complies with the requests and Audit demands as already requested and/or may follow if there is to be any opportunity to achieve a positive outcome from these discussions herein and/or to prevent the escalation of all matters to a position that, as inferred will only result in serious harm to numerous individuals and likely as perceived the complete failure of the businesses’ hereto.
I / we are unsure if the position and time of my, our ability to try and address and contain these issues internally and such as may still provide an opportunity to save these businesses etc has already passed.
With regards to “claims” and such being “waived” reciprocally across parties hereto – this is certainly something that I personally as an initial response feel likely to be facilitative to these matters if the above catastrophic and mortal fears do not evolve and can be avoided.

That is all I can share for now given other demands upon my time – which is severely limited as said because of my health.

Please not I have NOT discussed or shared the contents of this reply with any other party prior to sending.

I can only state at this immediate time, that I will attempt to revert further as soon as I am able but I hope / trust that you concurrently acknowledge that actions, whatever possibilities may be achieved, will be imminently and promptly required critically by others also – such as Mr Earl for one.

Regards

George